When sales behavior breaks, the standard response is to change comp. The logic is reasonable on its face: incentives drive behavior, so adjusting the incentive should adjust the behavior. The logic is also wrong about half the time, and the wrong half is more expensive than the right half.
What comp can do.
Comp is good at reinforcing outcomes. If you want more of a thing measured in dollars at the end of a quarter, comp can lean on that outcome. Accelerators on multi-year contracts. Bonuses on net-new logos. Spiffs on strategic verticals. These work, within limits, because the outcome is countable, attributable, and timed.
Comp is bad at producing behavior. The moves that compound: the discovery question that uncovers the real budget, the multi-threading that prevents a single-stakeholder block, the silence after the demo that lets the buyer talk. These are cadenced behaviors, not incentivized outcomes.
You cannot comp someone into asking a better discovery question. You can train them, coach them, inspect them, and make the question part of the call cadence. But you cannot pay them into running it well.
What cadence does.
Cadence is what installs behavior. Cadence is the weekly call inspection. The pre-call planning ritual. The post-loss review that's run regardless of who's involved. The deal-level questions you ask in forecast that force the rep to know the answer before the meeting.
Cadence works because it is repetition under inspection. The behavior happens. It is observed. It is named. It is refined the next time it happens. That loop (happen, observe, name, refine) is the compounding mechanism. No comp plan replicates it.
The pattern repeats across teams that install it. A weekly call review starts as a chore the team tolerates. Eight weeks in, the questions sharpen (why did you skip the budget conversation on the second call?) and reps begin pre-empting them. By week twelve, the question stops getting asked because nobody is skipping the move. Cadence didn't motivate the behavior. It exposed the gap and refused to look away. Behavior follows attention, not incentive.
The right role of comp.
Comp is an amplifier, not an engine. Once cadence has installed the behavior, comp can reinforce it by pricing the outcomes that follow from the behavior more heavily. Multi-threading produces larger deals; comp can lean on deal size. Better discovery produces shorter cycles; comp can lean on velocity.
But cadence has to come first. Bolting comp onto an organization with no behavioral cadence just rewards the reps who happen to be doing the right things, and punishes the reps who haven't been shown how. The trajectory doesn't move. The complaints about the comp plan go up.
When the quarter wobbles, the temptation is to change the comp plan. The discipline is to ask: what cadence broke?
Ideas like this land every Friday in The Frontline Sales Forecast: one issue, one argument, and the steps to run it. Free, and worth your inbox. Subscribe free →